Every holding, cross-examined against the record.
Terminal001 builds a written case for each position you own: SEC filings, 13F institutional consensus, analyst dispersion, and live pricing, cross-referenced automatically and cited line by line. Not a balance you check. A case you can defend.
No account needed · One free analysis · Takes a few minutes
Revenue growth in the latest 10-K1 was driven by cloud infrastructure demand, corroborated by consistent accumulation across six tracked superinvestor filings2. Current pricing sits below the analyst consensus target3.
A tracker tells you what you own. This tells you whether you should hold it.
Every number on the screen traces back to a document you can open: a 10-K, a 13F, a price series. Nothing is asserted without a source, and nothing is hidden behind a score.
A verdict for every position
Each line in your book gets a written case: accumulate, hold, or recycle, with the filing, the consensus, or the price series that produced it.
Institutional positioning
See which tracked superinvestors hold what you hold, where consensus is thinning, and when a fund hedges rather than exits.
Read from the filing, not the headline
Company language is pulled from EDGAR directly, so the argument in your report is the argument in the document.
Risk against your mandate
One score, measured against the comfort level you set during onboarding, not against a benchmark that has nothing to do with you.
Regime, not just your book
Where the broad market sits on the risk curve today, which indicators are driving it, and the historical episode it most resembles.
An advisor that shows its work
Ask follow-ups in plain language and stress-test alternatives. Every answer traces back to something you can open and check.
Six layers behind a single verdict.
A one-line recommendation is easy to produce and impossible to trust. Each report is assembled in order, and every layer is visible in the output.
- 01
Your mandate
Risk tolerance, time horizon, objective, and the sectors you will and will not hold. Everything downstream is scored against this, not against a generic profile.
- 02
The position math
Positions normalised and enriched, then weights, sector and asset mix, concentration, and performance measured on a consistent basis you can trace.
- 03
The filing record
Recent 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K disclosures for the tickers you actually hold, so the fundamental picture comes from the company, not from commentary.
- 04
Institutional positioning
13F holdings across tracked superinvestors: who is accumulating, who has thinned out, and who is carrying disclosed protective positions.
- 05
Market context
The current risk regime, the indicators moving it, and the headline flow attached to each holding, so a single-name call is made in context.
- 06
The written case
All five layers resolved into a structured report and a conviction score per position, and the same foundation answers your follow-up questions.
What the report actually says.
Not a score and a shrug. A written case for every position, the risk measured against the mandate you set, and the specific trades that would close the gap.
+1.7 above mandate. Driven by concentration in two names rather than by the volatility of the book as a whole, which is why the fix is a trim, not a de-risk.
The book is up 18.4%, but the return is carried by two names. NVDA and MSFT together account for 41% of value, well above the ceiling implied by a moderate mandate, and technology sits at 62% of exposure, so a multiple compression event hits nearly two thirds of the portfolio at once. Balance-sheet quality across the top five is strong and the average hold period is over two years, which argues against wholesale selling. Recycling 8–12% out of the winners into broad-market and defensive exposure brings measured risk back inside the 5.5 comfort level without abandoning the thesis.
What is working
- Unrealised gains concentrated in cash-generative AI beneficiaries (NVDA +94%, MSFT +32%)
- Minimal overlap with high-leverage sectors; aggregate net debt / EBITDA below peer median
- Average holding period above two years on the top five names
What is exposed
- Single-name concentration: NVDA alone is 24% of portfolio value
- Sector correlation: 62% technology means one macro shock moves every major line
- No fixed income or defensive sleeve despite a stated moderate mandate
Exceptional run, but position size exceeds the mandate ceiling. Trim toward 12–15% and redeploy into diversified exposure.
Core compounder with cloud and AI optionality. Size is elevated, but filing-level fundamentals support keeping it large.
Underweight versus historical allocation. Services margin expansion and the buyback support gradual adds on weakness.
Where the proceeds could go
Broad US equity
Cuts single-name risk while staying invested in US growth.
Investment-grade bonds
Adds ballast in line with a moderate mandate.
Sample figures, shown for illustration. Not financial advice.
Three steps to a real analysis.
No manual data entry, and no waiting on someone else’s quarterly note.
Set the mandate
A short onboarding captures risk tolerance, horizon, objective, and sector preferences. Two minutes, once.
Bring the book in
Upload a brokerage export or a screenshot of your positions. They are read, normalised, and priced automatically.
Read the case
Structured analysis per position, cited to source. Every suggestion is a starting point; nothing executes without you.
Run a free analysis on your own book.
No account needed. Upload one brokerage export and see the case for your positions in a few minutes.
No account needed · One free analysis · Takes a few minutes
Prefer an account first? Get started with Terminal001 · Sign in